On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 09:23:01PM +0800, zhengxing wrote: > On 2015?05?13? 03:22, Mark Brown wrote: > >Is it not possible to extend simple card to handle your use cases? > >Given the very generic naming and the fact that things like jack > >detection and so on should depend on the CODEC and board usually rather > >than on the SoC it doesn't sound like this is Rockchip specific. > >This also looks like you're reimplementing some device model enumeration > >stuff which probably shouldn't be happening but let's understand the > >problem you're trying to solve here before going too far into the code. > Because we are trying to bring rt5650 in the project, so we intend to > describe supported codecs with DTS via only a rockchip machine driver file, > others remain pre-implement(like max98090 / rt5645 that vendor machine > driver). I don't undertand what you're saying here, sorry - why is this not just a case of writing multiple machine drivers? > I communicated with Dylan, and he told me that the jack detection is an > issue in the simple-card, and suggested we are better to send them at > present. But what are these issues? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/attachments/20150513/ebaecac9/attachment.sig>
