Use the below scripts to check:
scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --subject arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
Although there is a check, it's no matter.
CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see
Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt
+167udelay(10);
total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 checks, 362 lines checked
Changes in v2:
- As Kever points out, Fix the subject typo WIF/WFI in PATCH [2/3].
- As Heiko suggestion, re-adjust the cpu on/off flow in PATCH [1/3].
- Use the checkpatch.pl -f --subjective to check in PATCH [3/3].
Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt at rock-chips.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
index 17b3473..fc50e1f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static int __cpuinit rockchip_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu,
if (cpu >= ncores) {
pr_err("%s: cpu %d outside maximum number of cpus %d\n",
- __func__, cpu, ncores);
+ __func__, cpu, ncores);
return -ENXIO;
}
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static int __cpuinit rockchip_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu,
* */
udelay(10);
writel(virt_to_phys(rockchip_secondary_startup),
- sram_base_addr + 8);
+ sram_base_addr + 8);
writel(0xDEADBEAF, sram_base_addr + 4);
dsb_sev();
}
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static int rockchip_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
static void rockchip_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
{
v7_exit_coherency_flush(louis);
- while(1)
+ while (1)
cpu_do_idle();
}
#endif
@@ -358,4 +358,5 @@ static struct smp_operations rockchip_smp_ops __initdata = {
.cpu_die = rockchip_cpu_die,
#endif
};
+
CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(rk3066_smp, "rockchip,rk3066-smp", &rockchip_smp_ops);
--
1.9.1
