On 2015?07?10? 18:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> platform_driver does not need to set an owner because
> platform_driver_register() will set it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski at samsung.com>
>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> 1. Split owner removal from rockchip to separate patch (spotted by Mark
> Yao).
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
> index 01b558fe3695..9a0c2911272a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
> @@ -555,7 +555,6 @@ static struct platform_driver rockchip_drm_platform_driver = {
> .probe = rockchip_drm_platform_probe,
> .remove = rockchip_drm_platform_remove,
> .driver = {
> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .name = "rockchip-drm",
> .of_match_table = rockchip_drm_dt_ids,
> .pm = &rockchip_drm_pm_ops,
Thanks for the fix, applied to my drm-next branch, :-)
--
?ark
