On 2015?07?10? 13:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > i2c_driver does not need to set an owner because i2c_register_driver() > will set it. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski at samsung.com> > > --- > > The coccinelle script which generated the patch was sent here: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2029903.html > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c | 1 - > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c | 1 - > drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c | 1 - > 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c > index 1a6607beb29f..be881e9fef8f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c > @@ -668,7 +668,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver ps8622_driver = { > .remove = ps8622_remove, > .driver = { > .name = "ps8622", > - .owner = THIS_MODULE, > .of_match_table = ps8622_devices, > }, > }; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c > index 1b1bf2384815..0ffa3a6a206a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c > @@ -400,7 +400,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver ptn3460_driver = { > .remove = ptn3460_remove, > .driver = { > .name = "nxp,ptn3460", > - .owner = THIS_MODULE, > .of_match_table = ptn3460_match, > }, > }; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c > index 01b558fe3695..9a0c2911272a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c > @@ -555,7 +555,6 @@ static struct platform_driver rockchip_drm_platform_driver = { > .probe = rockchip_drm_platform_probe, > .remove = rockchip_drm_platform_remove, > .driver = { > - .owner = THIS_MODULE, But rockchip drm is platform driver not i2c_driver, why remove its .owner ? -Mark > .name = "rockchip-drm", > .of_match_table = rockchip_drm_dt_ids, > .pm = &rockchip_drm_pm_ops,
