Am Dienstag, 29. Dezember 2015, 14:59:59 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
> On December 27, 2015 11:22:20 PM PST, Xing Zheng <zhengxing at rock-chips.com>
wrote:
> >The RK3036's GRFs offset are different with RK3066/RK3188, and need to
> >set
> >mac TX/RX clock before probe emac.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Xing Zheng <zhengxing at rock-chips.com>
> >---
>
> <snip>
>
> > };
> >
> > static const struct of_device_id emac_rockchip_dt_ids[] = {
> >
> >- { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3066-emac", .data =
> >&emac_rockchip_dt_data[0] },
> >- { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3188-emac", .data =
> >&emac_rockchip_dt_data[1] },
> >+ { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3036-emac", .data =
> >&emac_rockchip_dt_data[0] },
> >+ { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3066-emac", .data =
> >&emac_rockchip_dt_data[1] },
> >+ { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3188-emac", .data =
> >&emac_rockchip_dt_data[2] },
> >
> > { /* Sentinel */ }
>
> Food for thought, you might want to use an enum here to index
> emac_rockchip_dt_data which would be less error prone if you add/remove
> entries in this structure.
Or just have the structs separately and not in array-form at all, aka
rk3066_emac_dt_data, rk3036_emac_dt_data.
I don't think the original array really improves anything.
