Am Montag, 15. September 2014, 09:59:23 schrieb Mark Brown: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 09:23:02PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > There is a high potential of more than one of those regulators existing > > on a board, so name the regulator according to the name provided in the > > initdata instead of statically. > > No, this is pointless and broken. The core will already use the > board-specific name to identify the regulator in diagnostics and so on, > the name being supplied here is supposed to describe the regulator > within the device. ok, sorry for the mess-up I've just tested, patches 3-5 apply and work correctly without this one, so do you want to apply them like this or a resend of last 3? Heiko -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 490 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/attachments/20140916/cdf12d71/attachment.sig>
