RE: [PATCH v4 08/11] can: rcar_canfd: Add shift table to struct rcar_canfd_hw_info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Geert,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 16 March 2025 09:53
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] can: rcar_canfd: Add shift table to struct rcar_canfd_hw_info
> 
> Hi Biju,
> 
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 at 18:31, Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Thu, 6 Mar 2025
> > > at 13:43, Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > R-Car Gen3 and Gen4 has some differences in the shift bits. Add a
> > > > shift table to handle these differences. After this drop the
> > > > unused functions reg_gen4() and is_gen4().
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > A suggestion for improvement below.
> > >
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
> > > > @@ -90,11 +90,13 @@
> > > >  /* RSCFDnCFDGAFLCFG0 / RSCFDnGAFLCFG0 */  #define
> > > > RCANFD_GAFLCFG_SETRNC(gpriv, n, x) \
> > > >         (((x) & (gpriv)->info->mask_table[RCANFD_RNC_MASK]) << \
> > > > -        (reg_gen4(gpriv, 16, 24) - ((n) & 1) * reg_gen4(gpriv, 16, 8)))
> > > > +        ((gpriv)->info->shift_table[RCANFD_FIRST_RNC_SH] - ((n) & 1) * \
> > > > +         (gpriv)->info->shift_table[RCANFD_SECOND_RNC_SH]))
> > >
> > > Both shifts are dictated by the field width:
> > >   - R-Car Gen4 packs 2 values in a 32-bit word, using a field width
> > >     of 16 bits,
> > >   - R-Car Gen3 packs up to 4 values in a 32-bit word, using a field
> > >     width of 8 bits.
> > > The odd split in two shifts is due to the MSB-first numbering of the
> > > fields.  Hence I think it would be better to use a field width
> > > parameter, and derive the proper shift value from that (like you
> > > have already done for ICU ;-)
> > >
> > > Note that the formula will have to be reworked anyway to support the
> > > third channel on R-Car V3H_2, as "n & "1 will no longer fly here...
> >
> > Agreed. Will introduce rnc_field_width variable in struct
> > rcar_canfd_hw_info and Simplify the calculation using the formula (32 - (n + 1) * rnc_field_width).
> > Which will work for third channel on R-Car V3H_2 as well.
> 
> Note that you still need to mask n, as n can be up to 7 (on R-Car V4H), while the register holds only
> 2 or 4 values.

OK, will add separate patch for fixing

-#define RCANFD_GAFLCFG(ch)		(0x009c + (0x04 * ((ch) / 2)))
+#define RCANFD_GAFLCFG(ch, n)		(0x009c + (0x04 * ((ch) / (n))))

Where n is gpriv->info->rnc_per_reg.

and SETRNC is simplified to

#define RCANFD_GAFLCFG_SETRNC(gpriv, n, x) \
 	(((x) & ((gpriv)->info->num_supported_rules - 1)) << \
-	 (reg_gen4(gpriv, 16, 24) - ((n) & 1) * reg_gen4(gpriv, 16, 8)))
+	(32 - (((n) % (gpriv)->info->rnc_per_reg + 1) * (gpriv)->info->rnc_field_width)))


Cheers,
Biju




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux