Hi Geert, Could you provide some input here on how you'd like these config options to be handled please ? Thanks ! Thierry > -----Original Message----- > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: mercredi 26 février 2025 15:40 > To: Thierry Bultel <thierry.bultel.yh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > thierry.bultel@xxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Paul Barker > <paul.barker.ct@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/13] arm64: defconfig: Enable Renesas RZ/T2H SoC > option > > On 26/02/2025 15:32, Thierry Bultel wrote: > > Hi Krysztof, > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Sent: mercredi 26 février 2025 15:22 > >> To: Thierry Bultel <thierry.bultel.yh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > >> thierry.bultel@xxxxxxxxxxx > >> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Paul > >> Barker <paul.barker.ct@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > >> linux-arm->kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/13] arm64: defconfig: Enable Renesas RZ/T2H > >> SoC option > >> > >> On 26/02/2025 14:09, Thierry Bultel wrote: > >>> Selects support for RZ/T2H (aka r9a09g077), and SCI (serial) > >>> specific code for it. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Bultel <thierry.bultel.yh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Reviewed-by: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> --- > >> > >> You never responded to my comments at v1. So I asked at v2. Still no > answer. > >> > >> That's v3 and still silence from your side. > > > > Yes, I understand your position and have added a paragraph at the end > > of the cover letter about this point. > > We do no read cover letters, unless look for dependencies, so if you > disagree with someone you ought to respond to the email directly. Not > silently discard. > > You keep adding more and more symbols, so your "out of scope of this > patchset" is no true. Otherwise every contributor will use exactly the > same arguments - "not my problem". > > So again NAK because it is something ought to be finally fixed (and is not > even tricky to, so I don't ask for impossible). > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
