Re: Q: use 1s irqs to overcome alarm minute granularity?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > It would not only gain us a better resolution for alarms, but also
> > allows for enabling UIE.
> 
> This is already something you can do. I admit this has become super
> convoluted since Jon switched UIEs to be handled using the alarm
> interrupt...

How can I enable UIE with alarms which do not support
one-second-resolution? I found that most, if not all, drivers which have
RTC_FEATURE_ALARM_RES_MINUTE or RTC_FEATURE_ALARM_RES_2S set, they all
disable RTC_FEATURE_UPDATE_INTERRUPT. Which makes sense to me when I
look at the UIE-via-alarms code in the RTC core. But, yes, it is
convoluted, so maybe I am missing something?

Thanks for your fast reply!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux