Hi Laurent,
Thank you for the review.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 6:18 PM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Tommaso,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 04:55:22PM +0100, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > In preparation for adding support for the RZ/V2H(P) SoC, where the D-PHY
> > differs from the existing RZ/G2L implementation, introduce a new
> > rzg2l_csi2_info structure. This structure provides function pointers for
> > SoC-specific D-PHY enable and disable operations.
> >
> > Modify rzg2l_csi2_dphy_setting() to use these function pointers instead of
> > calling rzg2l_csi2_dphy_enable() and rzg2l_csi2_dphy_disable() directly.
> > Update the device match table to store the appropriate function pointers
> > for each compatible SoC.
> >
> > This change prepares the driver for future extensions without affecting
> > the current functionality for RZ/G2L.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai.xr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c
> > index 4ccf7c5ea58b..3a4e720ba732 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c
> > @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ struct rzg2l_csi2 {
> > void __iomem *base;
> > struct reset_control *presetn;
> > struct reset_control *cmn_rstb;
> > + const struct rzg2l_csi2_info *info;
> > struct clk *sysclk;
> > struct clk *vclk;
> > unsigned long vclk_rate;
> > @@ -123,6 +124,11 @@ struct rzg2l_csi2 {
> > bool dphy_enabled;
> > };
> >
> > +struct rzg2l_csi2_info {
> > + int (*dphy_enable)(struct rzg2l_csi2 *csi2);
> > + int (*dphy_disable)(struct rzg2l_csi2 *csi2);
> > +};
>
> Unless you'll need to add non-function fields later, I'd name the
> structure rzg2l_csi2_phy_ops.
>
As based on the feedback on patch 09/18 I will keep the struct name as is.
> > +
> > struct rzg2l_csi2_timings {
> > u32 t_init;
> > u32 tclk_miss;
> > @@ -360,9 +366,9 @@ static int rzg2l_csi2_dphy_setting(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, bool on)
> > struct rzg2l_csi2 *csi2 = sd_to_csi2(sd);
> >
> > if (on)
> > - return rzg2l_csi2_dphy_enable(csi2);
> > + return csi2->info->dphy_enable(csi2);
> >
> > - return rzg2l_csi2_dphy_disable(csi2);
> > + return csi2->info->dphy_disable(csi2);
> > }
> >
> > static int rzg2l_csi2_mipi_link_enable(struct rzg2l_csi2 *csi2)
> > @@ -772,6 +778,10 @@ static int rzg2l_csi2_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > if (!csi2)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > + csi2->info = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > + if (!csi2->info)
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "Failed to get OF match data\n");
> > +
> > csi2->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> > if (IS_ERR(csi2->base))
> > return PTR_ERR(csi2->base);
> > @@ -890,8 +900,16 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops rzg2l_csi2_pm_ops = {
> > rzg2l_csi2_pm_runtime_resume, NULL)
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct rzg2l_csi2_info rzg2l_csi2_info = {
> > + .dphy_enable = rzg2l_csi2_dphy_enable,
> > + .dphy_disable = rzg2l_csi2_dphy_disable,
> > +};
>
> I'd recommend moving this just below the definition of the
> rzg2l_csi2_dphy_enable() function.
>
Ok.
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > +
> > static const struct of_device_id rzg2l_csi2_of_table[] = {
> > - { .compatible = "renesas,rzg2l-csi2", },
> > + {
> > + .compatible = "renesas,rzg2l-csi2",
> > + .data = &rzg2l_csi2_info,
> > + },
> > { /* sentinel */ }
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rzg2l_csi2_of_table);
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
>
Chers,
Prabhakar
