The comment was correct when it was added, at that time RZ/T1 was
the only SoC in the RZ/T line. Since then, further SoCs have been
added with RZ/T names which do not use the same SCIFA register
layout and so the comment is now misleading.
So we update the comment to explicitly reference only RZ/T1 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Bultel <thierry.bultel.yh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
index 924b803af440..b8f9034f891a 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static const struct sci_port_params sci_port_params[SCIx_NR_REGTYPES] = {
},
/*
- * The "SCIFA" that is in RZ/A2, RZ/G2L and RZ/T.
+ * The "SCIFA" that is in RZ/A2, RZ/G2L and RZ/T1.
* It looks like a normal SCIF with FIFO data, but with a
* compressed address space. Also, the break out of interrupts
* are different: ERI/BRI, RXI, TXI, TEI, DRI.
--
2.43.0
