RE: [PATCH 04/11] irqchip/renesas-rzv2h: Simplify rzv2h_icu_init()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Philipp,

Thanks for the review.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 20 January 2025 10:05
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] irqchip/renesas-rzv2h: Simplify rzv2h_icu_init()
> 
> On Mo, 2025-01-20 at 09:47 +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > Simplify rzv2h_icu_init() by using newly added devm_* helpers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzv2h.c | 15 ++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzv2h.c
> > b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzv2h.c
> > index fd432b43506b..a02d47529564 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzv2h.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzv2h.c
> > @@ -456,23 +456,23 @@ static int rzv2h_icu_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node
> *parent)
> >  		goto put_dev;
> >  	}
> >
> > -	resetn = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> > +	resetn =
> > +devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive_deasserted(&pdev->dev,
> > +NULL);
> 
> This changes the reset control to be optional without mentioning it in the commit description. Should
> this change be part of another patch?

Thanks, It is a typo. It should be devm_reset_control_get_exclusive_deasserted.

I will split simplification patches into two in the next version.

1) Adding devm_reset_control_get_exclusive_deasserted()
2) Adding devm_pm_runtime_enable()

Cheers,
Biju





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux