> Stable rules allow also cherry picking additional patches. To me picking > patch 1 and 4 sounds better than an intermediate fix since bug has been here > from the beginning. IMHO not so urgent than a regression. Even then, doesn't that mean that the series needs to be applied upstream first before it can go to stable? How to describe the dependency commit id otherwise? Either Alexandre adds this when applying, or some interested party ;) sends a backport request to stable. Or am I missing something? > Looks like we have been lucky. First dynamic address is 0x9 and previous > algorithm gets the same calculated dat_w0 value for at least for the > addresses 0x9 and 0xa. Makes sense. Still not too many I3C devices out there...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
