Hi Niklas, On Sat, Jan 4, 2025 at 1:17 PM Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2024-12-27 14:22:31 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 2:41 PM Niklas Söderlund > > <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The second CSI-2 C-PHY data-lane have a different line order (BCA) then > > > the two other data-lanes (ABC) for both connected CSI-2 receivers, > > > describe this in the device tree. > > > > > > This have worked in the past as the R-Car CSI-2 driver did not have > > > > has > > > > > documentation for the line order configuration and a magic value was > > > written to the register for this specific setup. Now the registers > > > involved are documented and the hardware description as well as the > > > driver needs to be corrected. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Thanks for your patch! > > > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/white-hawk-csi-dsi.dtsi > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/white-hawk-csi-dsi.dtsi > > > @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ csi40_in: endpoint { > > > bus-type = <MEDIA_BUS_TYPE_CSI2_CPHY>; > > > clock-lanes = <0>; > > > data-lanes = <1 2 3>; > > > + line-orders = <MEDIA_BUS_CSI2_CPHY_LINE_ORDER_ABC > > > + MEDIA_BUS_CSI2_CPHY_LINE_ORDER_BCA > > > + MEDIA_BUS_CSI2_CPHY_LINE_ORDER_ABC>; > > > remote-endpoint = <&max96712_out0>; > > > }; > > > }; > > > @@ -41,6 +44,9 @@ csi41_in: endpoint { > > > bus-type = <MEDIA_BUS_TYPE_CSI2_CPHY>; > > > clock-lanes = <0>; > > > data-lanes = <1 2 3>; > > > + line-orders = <MEDIA_BUS_CSI2_CPHY_LINE_ORDER_ABC > > > + MEDIA_BUS_CSI2_CPHY_LINE_ORDER_BCA > > > + MEDIA_BUS_CSI2_CPHY_LINE_ORDER_ABC>; > > > remote-endpoint = <&max96712_out1>; > > > }; > > > }; > > > > Using the MEDIA_BUS_CSI2_CPHY_LINE_ORDER_* definitions has a hard > > dependency on commit 91a7088096a49eb4 ("media: dt-bindings: Add property > > to describe CSI-2 C-PHY line orders") in media/master, hence I cannot > > take this patch in renesas-devel until that dependency is resolved. > > > > However, according to the cover letter, commit 573b4adddbd22baf ("media: > > v4l: fwnode: Parse MiPI DisCo for C-PHY line-orders") in media/master > > causes a regression in the absence of the line-orders properties > > (which I had missed before, unfortunately). > > So I think it is best if this patch goes in through the media tree, > > which already has the prerequisites and the regression: > > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Alternatively, I can: > > 1. Cherry-pick commit 91a7088096a49eb4 first, > > 2. Replace the MEDIA_BUS_CSI2_CPHY_LINE_ORDER_* definitions by > > their numerical values. > > > > Please let me know if you prefer option 1 or 2. > > Thanks! > > My preference would be for this patch to go thru the media tree with > your tags to create the least churn, if Sakari is OK with that ofc. > > If not I leave it up to Sakari which option is most preferable to him, > I'm OK with both alternatives. Note that it's getting a bit late for the alternatives, as I plan to send my PRs for soc today, or tomorrow the latest. Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds