> > @@ -123,7 +114,7 @@ static void hci_dat_v1_set_dynamic_addr(struct i3c_hci *hci, > > dat_w0 = dat_w0_read(dat_idx); > > dat_w0 &= ~(DAT_0_DYNAMIC_ADDRESS | DAT_0_DYNADDR_PARITY); > > dat_w0 |= FIELD_PREP(DAT_0_DYNAMIC_ADDRESS, address) | > > - (dynaddr_parity(address) ? DAT_0_DYNADDR_PARITY : 0); > > + (parity8(address) ? 0 : DAT_0_DYNADDR_PARITY); > > NAK - that isn't the same code at all. But the same algorithm? Please elaborate where you think the new code will fail compared to the old one. And frankly, are you aware of different parity calculations? Have you read the link which was in the kdocs of my new function?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
