Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: dts: renesas: rzg2ul-smarc-som: Enable serial NOR flash

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Biju,

On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 8:34 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Enable Renesas at25ql128a flash connected to QSPI0. Also disable
> the node from rzfive-smarc-som as it is untested.
>
> Tested the flash by flashing bootloaders:
> flash_erase /dev/mtd0  0 0
> flash_erase /dev/mtd1  0 0
> mtd_debug write /dev/mtd0 0 ${BL2_FILE_SIZE} ${BL2_IMAGE}
> mtd_debug write /dev/mtd1 512 ${FIP_FILE_SIZE} ${FIP_IMAGE}
>
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v3->v4:
>  * Updated commit description.
>  * Updated partition table.

Thanks for the update!

> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/rzg2ul-smarc-som.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/rzg2ul-smarc-som.dtsi
> @@ -201,6 +201,12 @@ irq {
>                 };
>         };
>
> +       qspi0_pins: qspi0 {
> +               pins = "QSPI0_IO0", "QSPI0_IO1", "QSPI0_IO2", "QSPI0_IO3",
> +                      "QSPI0_SPCLK", "QSPI0_SSL";
> +               power-source = <1800>;
> +       };
> +
>         sdhi0_emmc_pins: sd0emmc {
>                 sd0_emmc_data {
>                         pins = "SD0_DATA0", "SD0_DATA1", "SD0_DATA2", "SD0_DATA3",
> @@ -252,6 +258,45 @@ sd0_mux_uhs {
>         };
>  };
>
> +&sbc {
> +       pinctrl-0 = <&qspi0_pins>;
> +       pinctrl-names = "default";
> +       status = "okay";
> +
> +       flash@0 {
> +               compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
> +               reg = <0>;
> +               spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
> +               spi-tx-bus-width = <4>;
> +               spi-rx-bus-width = <4>;
> +
> +               spi-cpol;
> +               spi-cpha;
> +               m25p,fast-read;
> +
> +               partitions {
> +                       compatible = "fixed-partitions";
> +                       #address-cells = <1>;
> +                       #size-cells = <1>;
> +
> +                       partition@0 {
> +                               label = "bl2";
> +                               reg = <0x00000000 0x0001c000>;
> +                       };
> +
> +                       partition@1d000 { /* fip is at offset 0x200 */

Is this 4 KiB gap between the two partitions intentional?
If yes, I think it deserves a comment.

> +                               label = "fip";
> +                               reg = <0x0001d000 0x7e3000>;
> +                       };
> +
> +                       partition@800000 {
> +                               label = "user";
> +                               reg = <0x800000 0x800000>;
> +                       };
> +               };
> +       };
> +};

The rest LGTM.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux