Re: [PATCH] i2c: support gpio-binding for SMBAlerts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: support gpio-binding for SMBAlerts
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 20:30:28 +0200
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240909110430.28665-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
References: <20240909110430.28665-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Hi Wolfram,

On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 01:02:56PM GMT, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Most I2C controllers do not have a dedicated pin for SMBus Alerts. Allow
> them to define a GPIO as a side-channel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

looks good.

Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Andi

References:
- [PATCH] i2c: support gpio-binding for SMBAlerts
  - From: Wolfram Sang

Prev by Date: Re: [net-next 3/3] net: phy: marvell-88q2xxx: Enable auto negotiation for mv88q2110
Next by Date: Re: [net-next 3/3] net: phy: marvell-88q2xxx: Enable auto negotiation for mv88q2110
Previous by thread: [PATCH] i2c: support gpio-binding for SMBAlerts
Next by thread: [PATCH] clk: Switch back to struct platform_driver::remove()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SOC] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux