On 2024-09-06 23:04:50 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 11:39:55AM +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> > If a C45 only PHY is attached to a driver that only knows how to talk
> > C22 phylib will fallback and use indirect access. This frees the driver
> > from having to implement this themself.
> >
> > The IOCTL implementation for SIOCGMIIREG and SIOCSMIIREG do not use
> > these convenience functions and instead fail if a C45 PHY is used
> > together with a driver that only knows how to speak C22.
> >
> > Fix this by using the two convince functions that knows when to fallback
> > to indirect access to read/write to the MDIO bus when needed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> > index 4f3e742907cb..89f52bb123aa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> > @@ -342,9 +342,12 @@ int phy_mii_ioctl(struct phy_device *phydev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd)
> > if (mdio_phy_id_is_c45(mii_data->phy_id)) {
> > prtad = mdio_phy_id_prtad(mii_data->phy_id);
> > devad = mdio_phy_id_devad(mii_data->phy_id);
> > - ret = mdiobus_c45_read(phydev->mdio.bus, prtad, devad,
> > - mii_data->reg_num);
> >
> > + mutex_lock(&phydev->mdio.bus->mdio_lock);
> > + ret = mmd_phy_read(phydev->mdio.bus, prtad,
> > + phydev->is_c45, devad,
>
> Using phydev->is_c45 is probably wrong.
>
> mii_data->phy_id is the device on the bus you want to access. It does
> not need to be the same device as the MAC is using. Just because the
> device the MAC is using is a c45 device does not mean the device you
> are trying to access is.
I think phydev->is_c45. The outer if clause is checking if the PHY I
want to talk to is C45, or not. The phydev->is_c45 just express if the
MAC can talk C45, or if it only supports C22. This is the variable
mmd_phy_read() uses to determine if it shall fallback to indirect C45.
>
> Maybe i gave you some bad advice. Sorry.
>
> This API is reasonably well known to be a foot gun. You should only be
> using it for debug, and actually using it, even only to read
> registers, can mess up a PHY/phylib.
>
> The API gives you the ability to perform a C22 bus transaction, or a
> C45 bus transaction on any arbitrary device. That is all you need for
> debug, you can do C45 over C22 in user space. Yes, there are race
> conditions, but this API already has race conditions, which is part of
> why it is a foot gun.
I agree it's not the best. But is it not better to have the IOCTLs
working as they already exists, rather then have it function depending
on the combination of if the MAC and PHY both speak C22 or C45?
--
Kind Regards,
Niklas Söderlund
