Re: [PATCH -next RESEND 00/10] mtd: Use for_each_child_of_node_scoped()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jinjie,

ruanjinjie@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Fri, 30 Aug 2024 14:34:38 +0800:

> On 2024/8/26 20:49, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> > 
> > krzk@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 12:19:07 +0200:
> >   
> >> On 26/08/2024 11:52, Miquel Raynal wrote:  
> >>> Hi Jinjie,
> >>>
> >>> ruanjinjie@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 17:43:18 +0800:
> >>>     
> >>>> Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating over
> >>>> device nodes to make code a bit simpler.    
> >>>
> >>> Why is this a resend ? Did I miss a previous iteration?    
> >>
> >> You were not cc-ed on previous iteration. I asked for proper split
> >> between subsystems and sending to maintainers, thus this resend.  
> > 
> > Ok. Makes sense, and the patchset looks fine.  
> 
> Hi, Miquel,
> 
> Could this series be merged, thank you!

You've sent this series on Monday, we are Friday. I answered a first
time within 5h and reviewed it within 8h. So that means I will take the
patchset:
- when I have the time to do so
- after several days to give a chance to other to review it as well
- unless someone speaks up against it in a "reasonable time frame"
- unless a robot that parses the patches on the mailing lists complains
  about it (usually within few days, up to a week).

In general, a good rule of thumb is to refrain yourself from pinging
within 2 weeks for non-urgent matters like this series.

Thanks,
Miquèl





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux