Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] media: staging: max96712: Add support for MAX96724

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Julien,

On 2024-08-28 11:41:51 +0200, Julien Massot wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
> 
> On 8/27/24 3:18 PM, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> > The MAX96724 is almost identical to the MAX96712 and can be supported by
> > the same driver, add support for it.
> > 
> > For the staging driver which only supports patter generation the big
> > difference is that the datasheet (rev 4) for MAX96724 do not describe
> > the DEBUG_EXTRA register, which is at offset 0x0009 on MAX96712. It's
> > not clear if this register is removed or moved to a different offset.
> > What is known is writing to register 0x0009 have no effect on MAX96724.
> > 
> > This makes it impossible to increase the test pattern clock frequency
> > from 25 MHz to 75Mhz on MAX96724. To be able to get a stable test
> > pattern the DPLL frequency have to be increase instead to compensate for
> > this. The frequency selected is found by experimentation as the MAX96724
> > datasheet is much sparser then what's available for MAX96712.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > * Changes since v1
> > - Group in series together with binding.
> > ---
> >   drivers/staging/media/max96712/max96712.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> >   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/max96712/max96712.c b/drivers/staging/media/max96712/max96712.c
> > index 6bdbccbee05a..6bd02276c413 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/media/max96712/max96712.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/max96712/max96712.c
> > @@ -17,8 +17,10 @@
> >   #include <media/v4l2-subdev.h>
> >   #define MAX96712_ID 0x20
> > +#define MAX96724_ID 0xA7
> I sent some comments on the first serie about the device revision register.
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/20240527133410.1690169-1-niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Can you fix them in your next patch version ?

Thanks for pointing that out. I missed them as they where in a reply 
where we where discussing the Debug Extra register, my bad will fix.

> 
> Regards,
> -- 
> Julien

-- 
Kind Regards,
Niklas Söderlund




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux