Hi Marcin,
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 8:26 AM Marcin Wojtas <marcin.s.wojtas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> wt., 27 sie 2024 o 13:09 Jonathan Cameron
> <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
> > On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 03:57:11 -0600
> > Yangtao Li <frank.li@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Use devm_clk_get_enabled() and devm_clk_get_optional_enabled()
> > > to simplify code.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Tested-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Suggested-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Marcin Wojtas <marcin.s.wojtas@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > >
> > > @@ -7745,12 +7710,6 @@ static void mvpp2_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >
> > > if (!dev_of_node(&pdev->dev))
> > > return;
> >
> > Given this makes no difference any more, drop the above dev_of_node() check.
>
> This check is to not execute the clk-related code when booting with
> ACPI. It should remain as-is, unless the new devm_clk_get* api is
> capable of not exploding in non-DT case. Can you confirm?
As per the removals below, there is no code left in this function after
the check (i.e. the "else" part became empty).
> > > -
> > > - clk_disable_unprepare(priv->axi_clk);
> > > - clk_disable_unprepare(priv->mg_core_clk);
> > > - clk_disable_unprepare(priv->mg_clk);
> > > - clk_disable_unprepare(priv->pp_clk);
> > > - clk_disable_unprepare(priv->gop_clk);
> > > }
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
