On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 01:51:32PM +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote: > On 2024-08-20 09:34:55 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 6:16 PM Niklas Söderlund wrote: > > > This series adds bindings and support to rcar-vin for R-Car V4M by the > > > means of adding a Gen4 family fallback compatible. > > > > > > Previous versions of this series added V4M support like done for VIN > > > since the first Gen3 device, by the use of only a single SoC specific > > > compatible value. This was done as in Gen3 almost every new device > > > differed from the others and a family fallback was not very useful. > > > > > > For the Gen4 devices with a video capture pipeline currently documented > > > the VIN instances are very similar and a family fallback can be used. > > > This however requires updating existing DTS files to add this new family > > > fallback. This is done in a backward compatible way and the driver > > > retains the compatible values. > > > > > > See individual patches for changes since previous versions. > > > > > > Niklas Söderlund (6): > > > dt-bindings: media: renesas,vin: Add Gen4 family fallback > > > arm64: dts: renesas: r8a779g0: Add family fallback for VIN IP > > > arm64: dts: renesas: r8a779a0: Add family fallback for VIN IP > > > media: rcar-vin: Add family compatible for R-Car Gen4 family > > > dt-bindings: media: renesas,vin: Add binding for V4M > > > arm64: dts: renesas: r8a779h0: Add family fallback for VIN IP > > > > Any chance the media parts can be accepted, so I can take the DTS > > patches through the Renesas tree? > > I would be happy to have some feedback on the media parts as well as I > will need to send a very similar series for the rcar-isp driver to add a > family fallback for Gen4. But I have hold of on posting them until I > knew this is the correct path forward. I've reviewed the DT and media patches (1/6, 4/6 and 5/6), and will include them in a pull request later today with the minor typos reproted in the reviews fixed. > > BTW, running b4 seems to add two bogus Acked-by tags from Conor: > > > > $ b4 am 20240704161620.1425409-3-niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > Analyzing 7 messages in the thread > > Analyzing 14 code-review messages > > Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment... > > --- > > ✗ [PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: media: renesas,vin: Add Gen4 family fallback > > ✗ [PATCH v5 2/6] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a779g0: Add family fallback for VIN IP > > + Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (✓ DKIM/kernel.org) > > ✗ [PATCH v5 3/6] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a779a0: Add family fallback for VIN IP > > ✗ [PATCH v5 4/6] media: rcar-vin: Add family compatible for R-Car Gen4 family > > ✗ [PATCH v5 5/6] dt-bindings: media: renesas,vin: Add binding for V4M > > ✗ [PATCH v5 6/6] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a779h0: Add family fallback for VIN IP > > + Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (✓ DKIM/kernel.org) > > > > I cannot find these Acks in my inbox or on lore. > > What's happening? > > No idea, I can't find any Acks from Conner in my inbox neither. Both > patches in question where new in v4 of the series. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
