On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 10:45:43AM +0300, claudiu beznea wrote: > > > On 19.08.2024 19:39, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 01:22:39PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 19/08/2024 13:10, claudiu beznea wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 19.08.2024 14:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 01:23:44PM +0300, Claudiu wrote: > >>>>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> > >>>>> Document the Renesas RZ/G3S (R9A08G045) RIIC IP. This is compatible with > >>>>> the version available on Renesas RZ/V2H (R9A09G075). > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> --- > >>>>> > >>>>> Changes in v4: > >>>>> - added comment near the fallback for RZ/G3S; because of this > >>>>> dropped Conor's tag > >>>> > >>>> That's not a reason to request a re-review. > > > > FWIW, I don't care about how many binding patches I do or do not get > > credit for reviewing. > > I had no intention to drop your credit for reviewing this. In the past I That comment was meant for Krzysztof, so that he wouldn't feel like he should avoid acking so that I could re-ack in similar situations in the future. > went though situations where reviewer complained due to keeping the tag and > doing very simple adjustment on the next version. I dropped your tag to > avoid that situation here too and mentioned it in the change log. Ye, I did note that you'd not dropped it confusingly :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
