Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] dt-bindings: fuse: Move renesas,rcar-{efuse,otp} to nvmem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 09:37:36AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 6:24 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 03:38:06PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > The R-Car E-FUSE blocks can be modelled better using the nvmem
> > > framework.
> > >
> > > Replace the R-Car V3U example by an R-Car S4-8 ES1.2 example, to show
> > > the definition of nvmem cells.  While at it, drop unneeded labels from
> > > the examples, and fix indentation.
> > >
> > > Add an entry to the MAINTAINERS file.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > v3:
> > >   - New.
> > >
> > > I would expect that the calib@144 node needs:
> > >
> > >     #nvmem-cell-cells = <0>;
> > >
> > > but after adding that, "make dt_binding_check" starts complaining:
> > >
> > >     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/renesas,rcar-efuse.example.dtb: fuse@e6078800: nvmem-layout: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> > >           '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'calib@144' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> > >           Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('nvmem-cell-cells' was unexpected)
> >
> > Did you want 'nvmem-cell-cells' or '#nvmem-cell-cells'?
> 
> Oops, I've been (manually) re-adding and removing it again too many
> times during my investigations. "#nvmem-cell-cells", of course.
> According to my build logs, I had it right at least once ;-)
> 
> > >           'kontron,sl28-vpd' was expected
> > >           'onie,tlv-layout' was expected
> > >           from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/renesas,rcar-efuse.yaml#
> > >     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/renesas,rcar-efuse.example.dtb: fuse@e6078800: nvmem-layout: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'calib@144' were unexpected)
> > >           from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/renesas,rcar-efuse.yaml#
> > >     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/renesas,rcar-efuse.example.dtb: fuse@e6078800: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('nvmem-layout' was unexpected)
> > >           from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/renesas,rcar-efuse.yaml#
> 
> Anyway, with or without the typo, the error message is about the same:
> 
> - Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('nvmem-cell-cells' was unexpected)
> + Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('#nvmem-cell-cells' was unexpected)

And if you test your schema or DTS with all nvmem (so also layouts)
schemas?

Apparently fixed-layout schema was not applied.

Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux