RE: [PATCH v9 4/5] PCI: rcar-gen4: Add support for r8a779g0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Krzysztof-san,

> From: Krzysztof Wilczyński, Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2024 5:44 AM
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * The attached firmware file "104_PCIe_fw_addr_data_ver1.05.txt" in
> > > > + * the datasheet is a text file. But, Renesas is not able to distribute
> > > > + * the firmware freely. So, we require converting the text file
> > > > + * to a binary before the driver runs by using the following script:
> > > > + *
> > > > + * $ awk '/^\s*0x[0-9A-Fa-f]{4}\s+0x[0-9A-Fa-f]{4}/ \
> > > > + *      { print substr($2,5,2) substr($2,3,2) }' \
> > > > + *      104_PCIe_fw_addr_data_ver1.05.txt | xxd -p -r > \
> > > > + *      rcar_gen4_pcie.bin
> > > > + *    $ sha1sum rcar_gen4_pcie.bin
> > > > + *      1d0bd4b189b4eb009f5d564b1f93a79112994945  rcar_gen4_pcie.bin
> > > > + */
> > >
> > > I moved this comment to the top of the file, since it serves as more of
> > > a documentation bit for the controller itself, and is not specific to the
> > > function it was attached to, strictly speaking.
> >
> > I got it. Thank you.
> 
> I decided to drop this comment.  See below.

I got it.

> > > That said, I wonder if we should include this at all?  The file name might
> > > and most likely will eventually change, as the datasheet gets updated to
> > > include new revisions and erratas, etc.
> > >
> > > So, I wonder if this is simply better to be included in the datasheet
> > > itself, or some product guide and such, where Renesas can keep this up to
> > > date and the users appraised of what they need to do to convert the
> > > firmware correctly.
> >
> > I understood it. I'll consider it somehow...
> 
> After thinking about this a little more, I believe that it might be better
> to follow what some other drivers have done, and simply add this guide as
> a text file under a dedicated ../Documentation/admin-guide directory.
> 
> We can then mention, or not, at the top of the file that there is a guide
> available at this location for people to read on how to obtain and prepare
> the firmware.
> 
> Thoughts?

Thank you for your comments. I agreed. So, may I send such a patch? Or, should
I send whole patches as v10?

Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda

> 	Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux