On Mon, 24 Jun 2024, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 7:08 PM Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Jun 2024, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Commit bef64d2908e825c5 ("mmc: remove tmio_mmc driver") removed the last
> > > user of the .set_clk_div() callback in the tmio_mmc_data structure.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/mfd/tmio.h | 1 -
> > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/tmio.h b/include/linux/mfd/tmio.h
> > > index eace8ea6cda05a3d..aca74ac1ff69e6f7 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/mfd/tmio.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/tmio.h
> > > @@ -101,7 +101,6 @@ struct tmio_mmc_data {
> > > unsigned int max_blk_count;
> > > unsigned short max_segs;
> > > void (*set_pwr)(struct platform_device *host, int state);
> > > - void (*set_clk_div)(struct platform_device *host, int state);
> >
> > Any ramifications for just hoovering this up?
>
> I am sorry, I am not familiar with that expression.
> Can you please elaborate?
> Thanks!
If I take _only_ this patch and leave the MMC one, will something break?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
