Hi Michał, On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 2:40 PM Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 09:56:39AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 1:16 PM Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Replace `reg_data` access with the official wrapper. The field is going > > > away soon. > > > > Thanks for your patch! > > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404301218.URkWO6dj-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ > > > > I am not sure these tags are needed, as the issue is not present in > > any tree yet? > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Do you want me to pick this up (for v6.11), or do you want to queue > > this with the other patches from the series that removes reg_data? > > Please let me know. > > In case of the latter: > > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > If you're ok with it going through the regulator tree, then I guess it > would be easier to manage as the series would build without observing > additional dependencies. I was wondering how the rest of the series is doing? If you want me to queue this for v6.11, the deadline for that is this Friday. Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
