> -----Original Message-----
> From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2024 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] dt-bindings: i2c: renesas,riic: Document the R9A08G045 support
>
>
>
> On 21.06.2024 15:56, Biju Das wrote:
> >
> > Hi claudiu,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2024 1:55 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] dt-bindings: i2c: renesas,riic: Document
> >> the R9A08G045 support
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 21.06.2024 15:34, Biju Das wrote:
> >>> Hi Claudiu,
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2024 12:23 PM
> >>>> Subject: [PATCH 08/12] dt-bindings: i2c: renesas,riic: Document the
> >>>> R9A08G045 support
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> Document the Renesas RZ/G3S (R9A08G045) RIIC IP. This is compatible
> >>>> with the version available on Renesas RZ/V2H (R9A09G075). Most of
> >>>> the IP variants that the RIIC driver is working with supports fast mode plus.
> >>>> However, it happens that on the same SoC to have IP instatiations
> >>>> that support fast mode plus as well as IP instantiation that
> >>>> doesn't support it. For this, introduced the renesas,riic-no-fast- mode-plus property.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/renesas,riic.yaml | 8
> >>>> ++++++++
> >>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git
> >>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/renesas,riic.yaml
> >>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/renesas,riic.yaml
> >>>> index 91ecf17b7a81..c0964edbca69 100644
> >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/renesas,riic.yaml
> >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/renesas,riic.yaml
> >>>> @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ properties:
> >>>> - renesas,riic-r9a07g054 # RZ/V2L
> >>>> - const: renesas,riic-rz # RZ/A or RZ/G2L
> >>>>
> >>>> + - items:
> >>>> + - const: renesas,riic-r9a08g045 # RZ/G3S
> >>>> + - const: renesas,riic-r9a09g057
> >>>> +
> >>>> - const: renesas,riic-r9a09g057 # RZ/V2H(P)
> >>>>
> >>>> reg:
> >>>> @@ -66,6 +70,10 @@ properties:
> >>>> resets:
> >>>> maxItems: 1
> >>>>
> >>>> + renesas,riic-no-fast-mode-plus:
> >>>> + description: specifies if fast mode plus is not supported
> >>>> + type: Boolean
> >>>
> >>> Can't this info, as part of device data?? Based on frequency and
> >>> device data is enough to derive this info??
> >>
> >> We can't rely completely on device data because on RZ/G3S we have 2
> >> RIIC channels that support fast mode plus and 2 that doesn't support it.
> >
> > Can't array of bits for this channels won't help??
>
> Can you give an example? I'm not sure I understand how you would prefer me to use the array of
> bits.
struct riic_of_data {
u8 regs[RIIC_REG_END];
u16 fast_mode_info info; /* 1 means fast mode plus supported, starting with channel 0*/
};
.info = 0x3, means channel 0 and 1 has fast mode plus supported
.info = 0x0, none of the channel supported fast mode plus.
Cheers,
Biju
