> Probably I am missing something obvious in the big picture, but why > must this be modelled as a regulator? Can't the SDHI driver handle > this register bit directly? I suggested it because we already use external regulators with SDHI. So, I preferred the design where the internal regulator was just another regulator. Then, the SDHI core can just keep using regulator API. And not have two code paths for internal vs. external. Did I miss something?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
