On 03/06/2024 13:07, Simon Horman wrote: > On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 09:02:51AM +0100, Paul Barker wrote: >> On 01/06/2024 11:13, Simon Horman wrote: >>> On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 04:03:39PM +0100, Paul Barker wrote: > > ... > >>>> @@ -298,13 +269,14 @@ static void ravb_ring_free(struct net_device *ndev, int q) >>>> priv->tx_ring[q] = NULL; >>>> } >>>> >>>> - /* Free RX skb ringbuffer */ >>>> - if (priv->rx_skb[q]) { >>>> - for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_ring[q]; i++) >>>> - dev_kfree_skb(priv->rx_skb[q][i]); >>>> + /* Free RX buffers */ >>>> + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_ring[q]; i++) { >>>> + if (priv->rx_buffers[q][i].page) >>>> + page_pool_put_page(priv->rx_pool[q], priv->rx_buffers[q][i].page, 0, true); >>> >>> nit: Networking still prefers code to be 80 columns wide or less. >>> It looks like that can be trivially achieved here. >>> >>> Flagged by checkpatch.pl --max-line-length=80 >> >> Sergey has asked me to wrap to 100 cols [1]. I can only find a reference >> to 80 in the docs though [2], so I guess you may be right. >> >> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/611a49b8-ecdb-6b91-9d3e-262bf3851f5b@xxxxxx/ >> [2]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/coding-style.html > > Hi Paul, > > If Sergey prefers 100 then I won't argue :) > > FWIIW, think what has happened here relates to the Kernel, at some point, > going from 80 to 100 columns as the preferred maximum width, while Networking > stuck with 80. I saw that netdevbpf patchwork is configured for 80 cols and it has warnings for v4 of this patch [1], so I've already re-wrapped the changes in this series to 80 cols (excluding a couple of lines where using slightly more than 80 cols significantly improves readability). I'm planning to send that in the next hour or so, assuming my tests pass. [1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20240528150339.6791-8-paul.barker.ct@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ -- Paul Barker
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0x27F4B3459F002257.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature