On 18.04.2024 17:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Claudiu,
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 11:43 AM Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Commit dce0919c83c3 ("irqchip/renesas-rzg2l: Do not set TIEN and TINT
>> source at the same time") removed the setup of TINT from
>> rzg2l_irqc_irq_enable(). To address the spourious interrupt issue the setup
>> of TINT has been moved in rzg2l_tint_set_edge() though
>> rzg2l_disable_tint_and_set_tint_source(). With this, the interrupts are
>> not properly re-configured after a suspend-to-RAM cycle. To address
>> this issue and avoid spurious interrupts while resumming set the
>> interrupt type before enabling it.
>>
>> Fixes: dce0919c83c3 ("irqchip/renesas-rzg2l: Do not set TIEN and TINT source at the same time")
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
>> @@ -2045,7 +2045,9 @@ static void rzg2l_gpio_irq_restore(struct rzg2l_pinctrl *pctrl)
>>
>> for (unsigned int i = 0; i < RZG2L_TINT_MAX_INTERRUPT; i++) {
>> struct irq_data *data;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> unsigned int virq;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> if (!pctrl->hwirq[i])
>> continue;
>> @@ -2063,17 +2065,17 @@ static void rzg2l_gpio_irq_restore(struct rzg2l_pinctrl *pctrl)
>> continue;
>> }
>>
>> - if (!irqd_irq_disabled(data)) {
>> - unsigned long flags;
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * This has to be atomically executed to protect against a concurrent
>> - * interrupt.
>> - */
>> - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock.rlock, flags);
>> + /*
>> + * This has to be atomically executed to protect against a concurrent
>> + * interrupt.
>> + */
>> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock.rlock, flags);
>> + ret = rzg2l_gpio_irq_set_type(data, irqd_get_trigger_type(data));
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_crit(pctrl->dev, "Failed to set IRQ type for virq=%u\n", virq);
>> + else if (!irqd_irq_disabled(data))
>> rzg2l_gpio_irq_enable(data);
>> - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock.rlock, flags);
>> - }
>> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock.rlock, flags);
>> }
>> }
>
> LGTM, but I'd rather move the dev_crit() outside (i.e. after) the
> critical section.
I was in balance about having it as proposed. I'll send an update to move
it outside.
Thank you,
Claudiu Beznea
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
