RE: [PATCH v2 6/6] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add Device ID for R-Car V4H PCIe controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Frank,

> From: Frank Li, Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2024 11:09 PM
> 
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 05:47:23AM +0000, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > Hi Frank,
> >
> > > From: Frank Li, Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2024 12:21 PM
> >
> > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 11:45:40AM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > > > Add Renesas R8A779G0 in pci_device_id table so that pci-epf-test
> > > > can be used for testing PCIe EP on R-Car V4H.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c | 4 ++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> > > > index c38a6083f0a7..2fa3c6473c7d 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> > > > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
> > > >  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_RENESAS_R8A774C0		0x002d
> > > >  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_RENESAS_R8A774E1		0x0025
> > > >  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_RENESAS_R8A779F0		0x0031
> > > > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_RENESAS_R8A779G0		0x0030
> > > >
> > > >  static DEFINE_IDA(pci_endpoint_test_ida);
> > > >
> > > > @@ -1005,6 +1006,9 @@ static const struct pci_device_id pci_endpoint_test_tbl[] = {
> > > >  	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_RENESAS, PCI_DEVICE_ID_RENESAS_R8A779F0),
> > > >  	  .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&default_data,
> > > >  	},
> > > > +	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_RENESAS, PCI_DEVICE_ID_RENESAS_R8A779G0),
> > > > +	  .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&default_data,
> > > > +	},
> > >
> > > You use default_data, why need new device_id? I think you can use 0x0031
> > > to do test.
> >
> > I thought we can add a new device_id freely like other devices.
> > Since the PCIe controller's endpoint mode can configure the device id,
> > I can use 0x0031 to do test though.
> >
> > If such a reusable entry exists, is adding a new device id into the driver prohibited?
> 
> I just think it is not necessary. This list will become longer and longer.
> And difference device id can't help us at all.

I agreed. To record it, I'll make a patch to add such description in the pci_endpoint_test.c.

> We should use difference production as difference functions, or difference
> configuration.  Such as usb gadget product id, we use 0x4545 for all mass
> storage.

I see.

> Using difference devices id for difference function, such as 0x31 for
> ep_test 0x30 for virtual net, 0x29 for virtual console ...
> 
> Or using difference devices id indicate some features. For example, use
> 0x30 means support write to EP MSI ITS to trigger irq.
> 
> Donate a device_id to more valuable things.

I think so.

Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda

> Frank
> 
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Yoshihiro Shimoda
> >
> > > Frank
> > >
> > > >  	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_J721E),
> > > >  	  .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&j721e_data,
> > > >  	},
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.1
> > > >





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux