On 19/03/2024 07:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 18/03/2024 18:21, Prabhakar wrote: >> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Add support to validate the 'interrupts' and 'interrupt-names' properties >> for every supported SoC. This ensures proper handling and configuration of >> interrupt-related properties across supported platforms. >> >> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> v2->v3 >> - Listed interrupts and interrupt-names for every SoC in if check >> --- >> .../bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml | 95 ++++++++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml >> index af72c3420453..53f18e9810fd 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml >> @@ -82,38 +82,6 @@ properties: >> reg: >> maxItems: 1 >> >> - interrupts: > > I don't understand what is happening with this patchset. Interrupts must > stay here. Where did you receive any different feedback? Look how it is done: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml#L44 Best regards, Krzysztof
