> > For new bindings, or also for existing ones? > > Doing the former means there are inconsistencies among different SoCs > > in the same family. > > For the new ones. It's just naming inconsistency which does not cause > any issues. Otherwise you never move to vendor,device.h format... which > is not that critical, but in the long term brings uniformity. I haven't reviewed the patch itself, but for the naming scheme I'd suggest to follow Krzysztof's suggestion. If he is OK with this level of uniformity, then all is good, I'd say. Converting existing ones sounds more messy to me.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
