Re: [PATCH v5 8/8] dt-bindings: mfd: dlg,da9063: Convert da9062 to json-schema

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 06:51:14PM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> Hi Conor Dooley,
> 
> Thanks for the feedback.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 6:38 PM
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/8] dt-bindings: mfd: dlg,da9063: Convert da9062
> > to json-schema
> > 
> > On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 01:47:17PM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > > Convert the da9062 PMIC device tree binding documentation to json-
> > schema.
> > >
> > > Document the missing gpio child node for da9062.
> > >
> > > While at it, update description with link to product information and
> > > example.
> > >
> > > The missing child node with of_compatible defined in MFD_CELL_OF is
> > > causing the below warning message:
> > > da9062-gpio: Failed to locate of_node [id: -1]
> > >
> > > So, make all child nodes with of_compatible defined in struct mfd_cell
> > > as required property for da906{1,2} devices.
> > 
> > > +  gpio-controller: true
> > > +
> > > +  "#gpio-cells":
> > > +    const: 2
> > > +
> > > +  gpio:
> > > +    type: object
> > > +    additionalProperties: false
> > > +    properties:
> > > +      compatible:
> > > +        const: dlg,da9062-gpio
> > 
> > > +  - |
> > > +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> > > +    #include <dt-bindings/regulator/dlg,da9063-regulator.h>
> > > +    i2c {
> > > +      #address-cells = <1>;
> > > +      #size-cells = <0>;
> > > +      pmic@58 {
> > > +        compatible = "dlg,da9062";
> > > +        reg = <0x58>;
> > > +        gpio-controller;
> > > +        #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > 
> > > +        gpio {
> > > +          compatible = "dlg,da9062-gpio";
> > > +        };
> > 
> > I know you had some conversation with Krzysztof, but I still don;t really
> > follow this. Why is the parent, rather than the child, the one that gets
> > the "gpio-controller" and "#gpio-cells" properties? The commit message
> > just mentions why missing child node was added, but not the reason for the
> > gpio properties being added at what appears to be the "wrong" level.
> 
> 
> Please see [1], The driver is checking against parent "gpio-controller"
> 
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.0-rc4/source/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-da9062.c#L270

I would appreciate if you could note in your commit message the
rationale behind the strange setup. Citing the existing driver users etc
would be helpful.

Thanks,
Conor.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux