Re: [PATCH 2/3] Input: da9063 - Use dev_err_probe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Biju,

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 10:03 AM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 5:57 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > Replace dev_err()->dev_err_probe() to simpilfy probe().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> OK, I will send
>
> 1) separate patch for dropping unneeded prints related to OOM
> 2) A patch for replacing dev_err()->dev_err_probe() + Update error message for devm_request_threaded_irq()
> 3) separate patch for dropping print message for input_register_device();
>
> Is it ok?

Personally, I'd be fine with just a single "cleanup error printing" patch.
But Dmitry has the final say.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux