Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 9:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Convert DA906{1,2} bindings to json-schema
>
> On 07/12/2023 10:01, Biju Das wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski, Lee Jones,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 8:38 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Convert DA906{1,2} bindings to
> >> json-schema
> >>
> >> On 06/12/2023 16:57, Biju Das wrote:
> >>> Convert the below bindings to json-schema
> >>> 1) DA906{1,2} mfd bindings
> >>> 2) DA906{1,2,3} onkey bindings
> >>> 3) DA906{1,2,3} thermal bindings
> >>>
> >>> Also add fallback for DA9061 watchdog device and document
> >>> DA9063 watchdog device.
> >>
> >> Please explain here dependencies and make clear merging strategy. The
> >> patches cannot be taken independently.
> >
> > Rob mentioned it needs to be taken through MFD tree. See [1]
> >
>
> This I know, but you must explain it here - not in my reply, but in the
> cover letter. No one will remember what was agreed days ago, not
> mentioning that not everyone could read Rob's message. So how anyone
> reading your cover letter could know it?
Agreed, Will mention it in cover letter.
Cheers,
Biju
