On 30/11/2023 14:17, Niklas Söderlund wrote: >> >>> + - enum: >>> + - renesas,cpg-div6-clock >>> + - renesas,cpg-mstp-clocks >>> + - renesas,intc-irqpin >>> + - renesas,smp-sram >> >> smp-sram can have new compatibles? I am sorry, but this needs explanation... > > The intention is to list SoC agnostic compatibles here, or put another > way false positives to the generic pattern "renesas,.*-.*". So no > "renesas,smp-sram" can't have new compatibles but there might be new > renesas compatible strings that hit the pattern that is not related to a > SoC. Does this make sens? Well, now I get the meaning, but I don't find this obvious especially considering that contributors many, many times misunderstand "SoC agnostic" with "generic is OK". Generic compatible is not OK for the SoC. I think it is still the most repeated feedback from me. I hope you will be explaining this for Renesas contributors :) Best regards, Krzysztof
