On 15/11/2023 21:53, Prabhakar wrote: > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The RSPI block on the RZ/Five SoC is identical to one found on the RZ/G2UL > SoC. "renesas,r9a07g043-rspi" compatible string will be used on the > RZ/Five SoC so to make this clear and to keep this file consistent, update > the comment to include RZ/Five SoC. > > No driver changes are required as generic compatible string > "renesas,rspi-rz" will be used as a fallback on RZ/Five SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/renesas,rspi.yaml | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/renesas,rspi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/renesas,rspi.yaml > index 4d8ec69214c9..0ef3f8421986 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/renesas,rspi.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/renesas,rspi.yaml > @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ properties: > - enum: > - renesas,rspi-r7s72100 # RZ/A1H > - renesas,rspi-r7s9210 # RZ/A2 > - - renesas,r9a07g043-rspi # RZ/G2UL > + - renesas,r9a07g043-rspi # RZ/G2UL and RZ/Five This is getting silly. Or quite a churn. You are no making any functional changes. No compatible updates. Just update the comment everywhere in one patch. It's way too much of a hassle to deal with all these single emails! Best regards, Krzysztof
