Hi Christoph,
CC soc
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 11:43 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 11:34:55AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > The fix you are referring too is probably commit c1ec4b450ab729e3
> > ("soc: renesas: Make ARCH_R9A07G043 (riscv version) depend
> > on NONPORTABLE") in next-20231006 and later. It is not yet upstream.
> >
> > Still, it merely makes ARCH_R9A07G043 (which selects DMA_GLOBAL_POOL)
> > depend on ARCH_R9A07G043.
> > RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT still selects DMA_DIRECT_REMAP, so both can end
> > up being enabled.
>
> Ok, so we need to actually fix this properly. Lad, can you respin
> the fix to not select DMA_DIRECT_REMAP, for ARCH_R9A07G043?
ARCH_R9A07G043 does not select DMA_DIRECT_REMAP directly,
RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT does. And there are other users of
RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT (RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM and ERRATA_THEAD_CMO).
Should the selection of DMA_DIRECT_REMAP moved to their users?
Note that the fix is already in soc/for-next, so we need coordination
with the soc people.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
