Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] define and enforce phylink bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/09/2023 06:15, Andrew Lunn wrote:
There is a MAC driver currently under review which does not have a PHY
at all. The MAC is directly connected to a switch, all within one
IC. The link is always running at 5Gbps, the link is always up. It is
physically impossible to connect a PHY, so get_link_settings just
returns hard coded values.

The fixed-link property would be used to describe the link of the MAC here.

Fixed-link make sense for a general purpose MAC which could be
connected to a PHY, or could also be used without a PHY. fixed-link
simplifies the code in that the MAC driver does not see a difference,
it all looks like a PHY.

However for a MAC which cannot be connected to a PHY, there is no need
to emulate a PHY. The MAC driver will be simpler. So i would not
recommend a fixed-link in this situation.

There's a link, it must be described. The MAC driver can configure the link
without reading the fixed-link property as there's no room for guessing.

The phy-handle, pcs-handle, and sfp properties point out there's a PHY. The
fixed-link property can be used standalone to describe MAC to MAC links.

For this specific ethernet controller, the phy-handle, pcs-handle, and sfp
properties can be disallowed on its schema to point out the ethernet
controller cannot be connected to a PHY.

Arınç



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux