Hi Stephen Boyd,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: versaclock3: Document
> clock-output-names
>
> Quoting Biju Das (2023-08-17 07:22:08)
> > Document clock-output-names property and fix the "assigned-clock-rates"
> > for each clock output in the example based on Table 3. ("Output
> > Source") in the 5P35023 datasheet(ie: {REF,SE1,SE2,SE3,DIFF1,DIFF2}).
> >
> > While at it, replace clocks phandle in the example from x1_x2->x1 as
> > X2 is a different 32768 kHz crystal.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Closes:
> > Fixes: a03d23f860eb ("dt-bindings: clock: Add Renesas versa3 clock
> > generator bindings")
> > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> Applied to clk-next
As per Geert's suggestion [1], I am about to send a patch
for dropping "clock-output-names", as there is no validation for it and people can get it wrong.
Is it ok,if I send a patch dropping clock-output-names? Please let me know your opinion on this.
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/20230817090810.203900-2-biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Cheers,
Biju
