RE: [PATCH 2/4] usb: typec: tcpci_rt1711h: Convert enum->pointer for data in the match tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] usb: typec: tcpci_rt1711h: Convert enum->pointer
> for data in the match tables
> 
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 02:00:05PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 1:44 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 09:21:19AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 7:09 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 05:40:05PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 5:25 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 03:27:43PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 3:04 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > > > > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 07:44:00PM +0100, Biju Das wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > > > > > > For all your work likes this as I noted in the reply to
> > > > > > > > > Guenter that the couple of the selling points here are:
> > > > > > > > > 1) avoidance of the pointer abuse in OF table
> > > > > > > > >    (we need that to be a valid pointer);
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > There is no pointer abuse: both const void * (in e.g.
> > > > > > > > of_device_id) and kernel_ulong_t (in e.g. i2c_device_id)
> > > > > > > > can be used by drivers to store a magic cookie, being either
> a pointer, or an integer value.
> > > > > > > > The same is true for the various unsigned long and void *
> "driver_data"
> > > > > > > > fields in subsystem-specific driver structures.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > (void *)5 is the abuse of the pointer.
> > > > > > > We carry something which is not a valid pointer from kernel
> perspective.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But the data field is not required to be a valid pointer.
> > > > > > What kind and type of information it represents is specific to
> the driver.
> > > > >
> > > > > Where to find necessary information which is not always an integer
> constant.
> > > > > For example, for the driver data that has callbacks it can't be
> invalid pointer.
> > > >
> > > > If the driver uses it to store callbacks, of course it needs to be
> > > > a valid pointer. But that is internal to the driver.  It is not
> > > > that we're passing random integer values to a function that
> > > > expects a pointer that can actually be dereferenced.
> > > >
> > > > > Since OF ID table structure is universal, it uses pointers.
> > > > > Maybe you need to update it to use plain integer instead?
> > > >
> > > > It is fairly common in the kernel to use void * to indicate a
> > > > driver-specific cookie, being either a real pointer or an integral
> > > > value, that is passed verbatim.  See also e.g. the "dev" parameter
> > > > of request_irq().
> > >
> > > Yes, that parameter is void * due to calling kfree(free_irq(...)).
> > > So, that's argument for my concerns.
> >
> > Sorry, I don't understand this comment.
> > (kfree(free_irq(...)) is only called in pci_free_irq()?)
> 
> Passing void * for a "driver cookie" makes sense due to possibility of the
> passing it to other functions that want to have void * as your example
> shows.
> And that supports my idea of having void * over the unsigned long.

U-boot also uses unsigned long for .data in struct udevice_id. There may be a reason for it instead of void* ??

Cheers,
Biju




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux