On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 11:39:03AM +0000, Biju Das wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 08:56:00AM +0100, Biju Das wrote: > > > Sort OF table alphabetically by compatibles. > > > > > Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Wrong, I haven't suggested that. See comment to the previous patch. > > > > And this is definitely wrong as Geert explained already why. > > You need to fix the code that handles the ID table first. > > That rule applicable only for fallback. I checked bindings and there are no fallbacks. You can't check the _whole_ world, so you checked only bindings that are in tree. But it doesn't matter as a user somewhere may use something you have no access to. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
