RE: [PATCH RFC 1/2] drivers: fwnode: Extend device_get_match_data() to struct bus_type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andy,

Thanks for the feedback.

> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] drivers: fwnode: Extend
> device_get_match_data() to struct bus_type
> 
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 12:02:27PM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] drivers: fwnode: Extend
> > > device_get_match_data() to struct bus_type On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at
> > > 09:37:20AM +0100, Biju Das wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > You can't just throw one's SoB tag without clear understanding
> > > what's going on here (either wrong authorship or missing
> > > Co-developed-by or...?).
> >
> > Dmitry feels instead of having separate bus based match_data() like
> > i2c_get_match_data[2] and spi_get_device_match_data[3], it is better
> > to have a generic approach like a single API device_get_match_data()
> > for getting match_data for OF/ACPI/I2C/SPI tables.
> >
> > So, he came with a proposal and shared some code here[1].
> 
> Yes, I'm pretty much following the discussion.
> 
> > Since,I have send this patch, I put my signed -off.
> 
> I'm not talking about this. There is no evidence that Dmitry gives you
> any approval to use or clear SoB tag. Again, you may not do like this.

Here Dmitry is acknowledging, he is ok with the patch I posted.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/20230717131756.240645-2-biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/#25437032

Cheers,
Biju






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux