Re: [PATCH/RFT] pinctrl: renesas: rzv2m: Handle non-unique subnode names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 5:07 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The eMMC and SDHI pin control configuration nodes in DT have subnodes
> with the same names ("data" and "ctrl").  As the RZ/V2M pin control
> driver considers only the names of the subnodes, this leads to
> conflicts:
>
>     pinctrl-rzv2m b6250000.pinctrl: pin P8_2 already requested by 85000000.mmc; cannot claim for 85020000.mmc
>     pinctrl-rzv2m b6250000.pinctrl: pin-130 (85020000.mmc) status -22
>     renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac 85020000.mmc: Error applying setting, reverse things back
>
> Fix this by constructing unique names from the node names of both the
> pin control configuration node and its child node, where appropriate.
>
> Reported by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 92a9b825257614af ("pinctrl: renesas: Add RZ/V2M pin and gpio controller driver")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Untested on real hardware.
> The RZ/G2L pin control drivers needs a similar fix.

If I need to merge this for fixes it's be great if we could also
include a fix for RX/G2L.

Anyway, I expect a pull request for renesas fixes or some explicit
instruction on
what to do when it's tested and confirmed working.

Yours,
Linus Walleij




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux