On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 05:55:57PM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > This hardware can receive multiple frames so that using > napi_gro_receive() instead of netif_receive_skb() gets good > performance of RX. > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch.c > index aace87139cea..7bb0a6d594a0 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch.c > @@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ static bool rswitch_rx(struct net_device *ndev, int *quota) > } > skb_put(skb, pkt_len); > skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, ndev); > - netif_receive_skb(skb); > + napi_gro_receive(&rdev->napi, skb); Some other optmization which you could do later on is to improve rswitch_next_queue_index() as it is used on a per packet basis. > rdev->ndev->stats.rx_packets++; > rdev->ndev->stats.rx_bytes += pkt_len; > > -- > 2.25.1 > >
