Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Categorize ARM dts directory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 25/04/2023 00:23, Ansuel Smith wrote:
Il giorno mar 25 apr 2023 alle ore 00:10 Rob Herring
<robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 8:27 AM Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 03:20:18PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 28/03/2022 02:09, Ansuel Smith wrote:
Hi,
as the title say, the intention of this ""series"" is to finally categorize
the ARM dts directory in subdirectory for each oem.

The main reason for this is that it became unpractical to handle 2600
dts files and try to even understand/edit/check the situation for a
specific target.

In arm64 we already have this kind of separation and I honestly think
that this was never proposed for ARM due to the fact that there are
2600+ files to sort and the fact that it will be a mess to merge this
entirely but IMHO with a little bit of effort we can finally solve this
problem and have a well organized directory just like arm64.

Some prerequisite on how this work was done:
- This comes entirely from a python script created by me for the task.
   linked here [1]
- I had to manually categorize all the different arch in the makefile
   based on the oem. I searched every arch on the internet trying to
   understand the correct oem. I hope they are correct but I would love
   some comments about them.
- This current ""series"" is all squashed in one big commit to better
   receive comments for this. The final version ideally would have all
   changes in separate commits. The script can already do this, it's just
   commented.

Here is a list of some discoveries while doing all the sorting.
These are totally additional reason why we need this.

While creating the script I discovered some funny things:
- We have orphan dts! There are dts that are never compiled and are
   there just for reference. We would never have noticed this without this
   change and probably nobody noticed it. They are currently all listed
   in the python script.
- We have dtsi shared across different oem. My current solution for them
   is: NOT SORT THEM and leave them in the generic directory and create a
   link in each oem dts that points to these dtsi. This is to try in
   every way possible to skip any additional changes to the dts.
   Current dtsi that suffers from this are only 3. (listed in the script)
- arm64 dts and dtsi reference ARM dts. Obviously this change would cause
   broken include for these special dtsi. The script creates a dependency
   table of the entire arm64 directory and fix every broken dependency
   (hoping they all use a sane include logic... regex is used to parse
   all the different dependency)

So in short the script does the following steps:
1. Enumerate all the action to do... (dts to move, scan dependency for
    the dts...)
2. Generate the arm64 dependency
3. Creates the Makefile
4. Generate the Makefiles for the current oem
5. Move all the related dts and dtsi for the current oem
6. Check broken dependency and fix them by editing the dts and writing
    the correct include (or fix any symbolic link)

This is an output that describes all the things done by the script [2]

I really hope I didn't commit any logic mistake in the script but most
of the work should be done.


+Cc Arnd and Olof,

Ansuel,
Thanks for you patch. Please cc the SoC maintainers in such submissions.
It seems that you got some quite nice discussion, but still the core
folks are not Cced, so no one would be able to take your patch...


I had some problem with gmail and sending mail too much users. I put Rob
and You and all the various list to try to workaround the "gmail spam
protection"

I am pretty sure we were discussing such split idea in the past and it
did not get traction, but I cannot recall the exact discussion.


I think the main issue here is how to handle bot and how problematic is
to merge this. As written in the cover letter the final version of this
should be a big series of 50+ patch with every commit specific to each
oem. In theory we should be able to merge the different oem separately
and try to at least start the categorization.
Another idea I got to at least have a "migration path" is to convert
every dts in the dts/ directory to a symbolic link that target the dts
in the correct oem. But I assume that would fix only part of the problem
and git am will still be problematic.

I have a script[1] that does the conversion written the last time this
came up. Just have to agree on directory names. I think the easiest
would be for Arnd/Olof to run it at the end of a merge window before
rc1.

I'm very much in favor of this happening especially before *any*
overlays are added to add to the mess (it's probably already
happened).

Rob

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20181204183649.GA5716@bogus/

Hi Rob,
thanks for recovering this. I remember also providing a script.

Anyway considering the amount of stuff to move, I feel like some
OEM might be problematic to move due to rebase and merging problems.

We should consider accepting moving only some and keep other
in the unsorted path. And move them at the first time possible with
the help of the maintainers.

One main blocker of this is some qcom dts that are linked to arm64
directory, so for some dts special care is needed.


Same happens for broadcom RaspberryPi DTS. The arm64 ones include the arm ones.

Regards,
Matthias



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux