Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 09:29:48 +0100
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxxx>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx>, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@xxxxxxxxx>, Samuel Holland <samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-stm32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sunxi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAL_Jsq+pzQvsvk8KiyVZPrebMvV6-PfxFXFXcPOf0C21+-yo9A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20230310144721.1544669-1-robh@kernel.org> <CAMuHMdUaeyHs9fQxS+16F62uHaifJYMXKJpL2-xi-SL5HCrTHQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMuHMdX1=+WwWjfiWDYOjSzTjcYBEY+QR=XKuU+o5_SCyU7rag@mail.gmail.com> <CACRpkdaw7TodD0hr3vD8cGB80k0qtEiaC1ne-ivCj6YEefi44w@mail.gmail.com> <CAL_Jsq+pzQvsvk8KiyVZPrebMvV6-PfxFXFXcPOf0C21+-yo9A@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 7:18 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > So I need a new version of this patch before I can apply it
> > I guess, or there will be conflict with Reseas stuff?
>
> Can you just drop drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c from this patch?

You just exposed how lazy I am ;)

OK I did that, patch applied sans the renesas hunk.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

References:
- [PATCH] pinctrl: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
  - From: Rob Herring
- Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
  - From: Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
  - From: Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
  - From: Linus Walleij
- Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
  - From: Rob Herring

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH net-next] ethernet: remove superfluous clearing of phydev
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH net-next] sh_eth: remove open coded netif_running()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SOC] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]