Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Share RZ/G2L SoC DTSI with RZ/V2L SoC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Geert,

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:41 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:16 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 11:42 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > This series aims to reuse RZ/G2L SoC DTSI with RZ/V2L as both the SoCs are
> > > almost identical.
> > >
> > > v1 -> v2
> > > * Patch 1/2 unchanged, for patch 2/2 sorted the nodes based on the names.
> > >
> > > v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/cover/20230127133909.144774-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Prabhakar
> > >
> > > Lad Prabhakar (2):
> > >   arm64: dts: renesas: r9a07g044: Use SoC specific macro for CPG and
> > >     RESET
> > >   arm64: dts: renesas: r9a07g054: Reuse RZ/G2L SoC DTSI
> > >
> > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi |  254 ++---
> > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g054.dtsi | 1149 +++-----------------
> > >  2 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 1147 deletions(-)
> >
> > Do you have an opinion on this series?
> > Is this acceptable for you?
> > The final generated DTBs are identical to before.
>
> Given the feedback from Krzysztof and Rob on patch 1, and on IRC,
> I'm rejecting this series.
>
Ok, I'll rebase CRU work by dropping this series.

Cheers,
Prabhakar




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux